Supacare Perspectives
Original commentary, technical explainers, and practice notes from the Supacare team.
Follow on LinkedIn ↗Featured Insights
A feasibility study becomes more useful when the developer can supply evidence on project rights, baseline conditions, methodology fit, MRV, safeguards, regulation and delivery capacity. This guide explains what to assemble before commissioning the work.
Supacare Technical Team
Project Development & MRV Advisory
Organised for practical research
Explore practical research across climate and carbon themes, including blue carbon, methodologies, markets, finance, ESIA, ESG and circular economy.
Delivery records, household interviews, fuel tests and sensor data answer different questions. How project and field teams can preserve the evidence needed for a defensible clean-cooking monitoring system.
A practical comparison of the new household-cooking routes, with the actual SUM monitoring dates, the one unresolved cross-reference, and what developers should plan for.
VM0038 v1.1 includes two- and three-wheelers and battery swapping in its definitions, while VMD0049 excludes them from its positive list. Here is what developers should establish before committing to a project route.
Project Developer Guide
A feasibility study becomes more useful when the developer can supply evidence on project rights, baseline conditions, methodology fit, MRV, safeguards, regulation and delivery capacity. This guide explains what to assemble before commissioning the work.
Kenya's July 2026 guide is more than an Article 6 explainer. It sets a three-stage national decision path for carbon activities: No-Objection, Approval and, where international transfer is sought, Authorisation.
Verra's current improved agricultural land management methodology makes agricultural carbon a test of baseline evidence, additionality, soil-carbon measurement, models, leakage and conservative monitoring — not a claim based on one practice change or one soil result.
Gold Standard's new RECH v5.0 methodology makes clean-cooking carbon accounting more conservative. This review explains the technical controls that matter: baseline design, stove stacking, KPT precision, leakage and observation bias.
Gold Standard's Sustainable Management of Mangroves methodology is not a generic blue-carbon route. This technical review explains its real controls: historic land eligibility, additionality, biomass and soil-carbon accounting, leakage and auditable monitoring.
Verra's VM0033 v2.1 treats tidal-wetland restoration as more than planting. This technical review explains the hydrology, soil-carbon, methane, leakage, sea-level-rise and monitoring controls behind a credible blue-carbon calculation.
For years, one number has quietly decided how much a cookstove project is worth on the carbon market: the fraction of non-renewable biomass, or fNRB. It sounds like a technical footnote. It isn't. Overstate it, and a project mints credits for "savings" that were never real forest loss to begin with — a big part of why cookstove credits have taken such a public beating on integrity grounds over the past few years. That's finally changing, and not because of one registry's initiative. Gold Standard retired the old CDM Tool 30 in mid-2025 and let every existing fNRB value expire by the end of that year. The ICVCM has gone further, mandating the more rigorous MoFuSS model across cookstove methodologies market-wide. Verra is now the last major registry catching up, with a public consultation on VM0050 v2.0 open through August 10. The market has converged — the only question left is how ready individual projects are for it.
A practical procurement framework for companies buying carbon credits: how to test credit quality, claims risk, delivery risk, and whether a purchase is aligned with ICVCM, VCMI, Oxford and registry requirements.
Corresponding adjustments and ITMO language are now appearing in corporate carbon credit procurement. This guide explains what must be verified before a buyer pays for Article 6 authorisation.
A carbon project is not validation-ready because the concept is strong. It is validation-ready when the evidence file proves the baseline, additionality, monitoring plan, safeguards, stakeholder engagement, and ownership of emission reductions.
ACMI was launched at COP27 to accelerate voluntary carbon markets across Africa. It has set ambitious targets and attracted significant political backing. Here is what the initiative is, who is behind it, and what its targets mean.
The Voluntary Carbon Markets Integrity Initiative published its Claims Code of Practice to tell companies exactly what they can and cannot say when they use carbon credits. Here is what VCMI is, what the Claims Code requires, and what it means for companies buying credits from African projects.
The Integrity Council for the Voluntary Carbon Market was created to answer a simple question: what makes a carbon credit credible? Here is what ICVCM is, what the Core Carbon Principles require, and why they matter to anyone involved in voluntary carbon markets.
The East African coastline holds some of the most carbon-dense mangrove forests on earth. Three years after Gazi Bay, the first large-scale blue carbon projects are entering the credit market.
Gold Standard's January 2024 mandate for IoT-enabled usage monitoring on large-scale improved cookstove programmes fundamentally changes the economics and MRV design of clean cooking projects in East Africa. Here is what developers need to know before they register.
Baku's breakthrough on Article 6.4 finalised the mechanism's rulebook, but corresponding adjustments are creating a two-tier credit market that African developers cannot afford to ignore.
After reviewing ESIA reports for 40+ lender-financed projects across East Africa, we have identified five recurring failures that delay financial close, sometimes by over a year.
Standard selection is the most consequential early-stage decision for an African NBS developer. VCS and Gold Standard are not interchangeable, their additionality frameworks, co-benefit requirements and buyer markets differ fundamentally. Here is how to choose.
For smallholder agroforestry projects in Kenya, the choice between Plan Vivo and Verra VCS determines more than certification, it shapes the project's governance structure, monitoring burden, co-benefit architecture and long-term buyer market. This guide compares the two pathways across every dimension that matters.
Nature-related disclosure is moving from voluntary to expected. African corporates and project developers who understand the TNFD-to-credit pipeline will be positioned to capture both compliance value and market premium.
The Article 6.4 Supervisory Body approved the REDD+ transition framework in 2025, opening a direct pathway for African VCS REDD+ projects to generate Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes with host-country authorisation. Here is the methodology and procedural pathway that makes it possible.
UNFCCC's updated clean cooking methodology introduces mandatory IoT monitoring for large programmes, tighter default emission factors, and a new stove usage survey protocol that fundamentally changes credit accounting.
VM0007 is the world's most widely used REDD+ methodology, but its application in East African forest contexts presents specific technical challenges that are frequently misjudged. This review examines the six areas where African project documents most commonly attract VVB corrective action requests.
Development finance doesn't have to mean equity dilution. We map the five instruments increasingly used to finance African carbon and nature projects, and the deal structures that work for each project type.
After preparing and reviewing ESIA documentation for more than 40 Category A projects in East, West, and Southern Africa, patterns of failure are clear, and almost entirely preventable.
Free newsletter
Subscribe free — we email you when a new article goes live. No spam, unsubscribe any time.